In an era of streaming abundance, truly exceptional television writing has become both rarer and more valuable. While spectacular visuals and A-list actors grab headlines, it’s the writing that transforms a show from mere entertainment into an unforgettable experience that lives in our minds long after the credits roll.
Great TV writing doesn’t just tell stories—it creates worlds we want to inhabit, characters we can’t stop thinking about, and dialogue that becomes part of our cultural vocabulary. Whether it’s a chemistry teacher’s descent into darkness, a mobster grappling with therapy, or “show about nothing” that revolutionized comedy, the best-written television challenges us, entertains us, and ultimately changes how we see storytelling itself.
This comprehensive guide explores television’s finest writing achievements, drawing from the Writers Guild of America’s authoritative rankings, critical consensus, and cultural impact. From classic sitcoms to modern prestige dramas, these shows represent the pinnacle of what television writing can accomplish.
What Defines Exceptional TV Writing?
Before diving into specific shows, it’s essential to understand what separates great writing from the merely good. According to the Writers Guild of America’s evaluation of over 100 television series spanning seven decades, several key elements consistently appear in the best-written shows:
Character Depth Over Plot Gimmicks
The foundation of great TV writing is character. As writer Paul Brownfield notes in his analysis of the WGA’s rankings, “If character is destiny, then character has also long been the backbone of great TV writing.” The shows that endure aren’t remembered for their plot twists alone—they’re remembered for characters who feel real, flawed, and recognizably human.
- Psychological complexity: Characters with contradictory desires and moral gray areas
- Transformation arcs: Meaningful character evolution over time
- Authentic voice: Dialogue that reveals personality and worldview
- Relatable motivations: Actions driven by understandable (if not always admirable) human needs
Dialogue That Serves Multiple Purposes
Exceptional television dialogue accomplishes several goals simultaneously. It reveals character, advances plot, establishes tone, and creates quotable moments that resonate with audiences. Whether it’s Aaron Sorkin’s rapid-fire political sparring in The West Wing or David Milch’s Shakespearean profanity in Deadwood, great dialogue has a distinct voice.
Structural Innovation and Risk-Taking
The best-written shows often break conventional storytelling rules. They experiment with narrative structure, challenge audience expectations, and refuse to follow predictable formulas. This willingness to take creative risks separates groundbreaking television from safe, formulaic content.
Character-Driven Dramas: The Art of the Anti-Hero
The past two decades have witnessed what critics call television’s “second golden age,” characterized largely by morally complex protagonists who challenge viewers to reckon with uncomfortable truths about human nature.
The Sopranos (1999-2007)
Creator David Chase’s masterpiece earned the top position on the Writers Guild of America’s list of best-written TV series for good reason. The Sopranos fundamentally changed what television could be, proving that the medium could match—and even surpass—cinema in psychological depth and thematic complexity.
What initially seemed like a simple premise—”a mobster in therapy, having problems with his mother,” as Chase described it—became a profound exploration of American masculinity, family dysfunction, and the search for meaning in modern life. The show’s writing brilliance lies in its refusal to judge its protagonist while simultaneously exposing his moral bankruptcy.
Writing strengths:
- Layered symbolism and dream sequences that reward close viewing
- Dialogue that reveals subtext and psychological complexity
- Unpredictable narrative structure that defied conventional storytelling
- Characters with genuine depth across all roles, not just leads
Breaking Bad (2008-2013)
Vince Gilligan’s transformation of Walter White from sympathetic chemistry teacher to ruthless drug kingpin represents a masterclass in character evolution. The show’s writing operates on meticulous logic—every action has consequences, every decision reveals character, and nothing happens without purpose.
The genius of Breaking Bad‘s writing lies in how it makes viewers complicit in Walter’s descent. We understand his motivations, rationalize his choices, and only gradually realize we’ve been rooting for a monster. This moral complexity, combined with dialogue that crackles with tension and visual storytelling that rivals any film, makes it one of television’s finest writing achievements.
The Wire (2002-2008)
David Simon’s sprawling examination of Baltimore’s institutions—police, drugs, education, media, and politics—operates more like a novel than traditional television. Each season adds new layers while maintaining intricate connections between storylines and characters.
The writing in The Wire distinguishes itself through authenticity (many writers had journalism or law enforcement backgrounds) and its refusal to simplify complex social issues. Characters speak in realistic dialect, storylines unfold slowly, and the show trusts its audience to follow intricate plotting without hand-holding.
Why critics call it “novelistic”:
- Season-long narrative arcs that build methodically
- Interconnected character storylines across different institutions
- Dense, realistic dialogue that requires active viewing
- Thematic depth exploring systemic failure and institutional decay
Mad Men (2007-2015)
Matthew Weiner’s period drama about 1960s advertising demonstrates that “what’s not said” can be as powerful as dialogue. The show’s writing operates on suggestion, subtext, and visual symbolism, creating a formalist style that rewards patient viewers.
Don Draper’s literal stolen identity becomes a metaphor for the American reinvention myth, while the show’s meticulous historical detail grounds its exploration of changing social mores. The writing excels at showing how people present facades while harboring secret desires and disappointments.
Comedy Writing: From Observational to Absurdist
While dramas often receive more critical attention, comedy writing presents unique challenges. Great comedy must be both immediately funny and structurally sound, balancing jokes with character development and emotional truth.
Seinfeld (1989-1998)
Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld’s “show about nothing” revolutionized sitcom writing by rejecting traditional lessons and character growth. The show’s brilliance lies in its observational specificity—mining comedy from everyday frustrations and social conventions that everyone experiences but rarely articulates.
The writing employed intricate plotting where seemingly unrelated storylines converge in surprising ways. Episodes like “The Boyfriend” or “The Subway” demonstrate structural complexity that rivals any drama, all while maintaining consistent laughs.
Innovation in sitcom writing:
- No hugging, no learning—characters never grow or change
- Multiple storylines that intersect ingeniously
- Observational humor about universal experiences
- Created new vocabulary (“close talker,” “re-gifter,” “yada yada”)
Arrested Development (2003-2006, 2013-2019)
Mitchell Hurwitz’s densely layered comedy rewards rewatching like no other sitcom. The writing operates on multiple levels simultaneously—sight gags, verbal callbacks, foreshadowing, and running jokes that span entire seasons.
What makes Arrested Development exceptional is its trust in audience intelligence. Jokes aren’t repeated or explained; callbacks to previous episodes assume viewers remember details; and the narrator provides ironic commentary that adds another layer of humor.
Fleabag (2016-2019)
Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s two-season masterpiece demonstrates how economy of writing can create devastating impact. With just 12 episodes totaling under six hours, Fleabag explores grief, family dysfunction, sexuality, and redemption with surgical precision.
The show’s direct-address technique—where Fleabag breaks the fourth wall to confide in viewers—creates intimacy while also revealing her unreliability. The writing is simultaneously hilarious and heartbreaking, often within the same scene, showcasing how comedy can illuminate profound truths about human vulnerability.
The Good Place (2016-2020)
Michael Schur’s philosophical comedy proves that network television can still take creative risks. The show’s writing incorporates genuine ethical philosophy while maintaining accessibility and humor—a nearly impossible balance that few shows attempt, let alone achieve.
What distinguishes The Good Place is its willingness to constantly reinvent itself. Each season presents new challenges and twists, but the writing always serves character development. The finale delivers emotional satisfaction while staying true to the show’s philosophical framework.
Anthology Excellence: Self-Contained Brilliance
The Twilight Zone (1959-1964)
Rod Serling’s anthology series remains influential 60 years later because its writing tackled timeless themes—prejudice, paranoia, conformity, mortality—through science fiction and fantasy allegories. Each episode functions as a complete short story with twist endings that reveal deeper truths about human nature.
The show’s opening narration became iconic, but the real writing brilliance lies in tight storytelling that introduces characters, establishes stakes, develops conflict, and delivers satisfying conclusions in just 25 minutes.
Fargo (2014-Present)
Noah Hawley’s anthology drama captures the Coen Brothers’ film aesthetic while expanding it across seasons. Each installment tells a complete story with new characters, yet maintains thematic and tonal consistency through dark humor, Midwestern politeness masking violence, and ordinary people drawn into extraordinary circumstances.
The writing excels at creating memorable characters in limited time, crafting intricate plots that feel both inevitable and surprising, and balancing violence with dark comedy without undermining either.
Political & Social Commentary: Smart Television That Challenges
The West Wing (1999-2006)
Aaron Sorkin’s idealistic political drama features some of television’s most distinctive dialogue—rapid-fire, intellectually dense, and unapologetically optimistic about government’s potential to do good. Characters engage in “walk and talks” through White House corridors, debating policy with wit and intelligence.
The show’s writing presents political complexity without cynicism, a rarity in any era. Even viewers who disagree with its political perspective can appreciate the craft of its dialogue and the intelligence it assumes in its audience.
Succession (2018-2023)
Jesse Armstrong’s Shakespearean family drama features dialogue so sharp it draws blood. The Roy family’s verbal sparring combines devastating insults with emotional vulnerability, creating a show that’s simultaneously a satire of wealth and a genuine tragedy about damaged people.
The writing’s brilliance lies in how it makes deeply unlikable characters compelling. We watch not because we root for anyone, but because the dialogue crackles and the power dynamics shift with every scene.
Science Fiction & Fantasy: Genre With Depth
Battlestar Galactica (2004-2009)
Ronald D. Moore’s reimagining transformed space opera into serious drama exploring terrorism, military ethics, religion, and survival. The writing uses science fiction elements to examine contemporary issues—the Cylon threat becomes a metaphor for post-9/11 paranoia and the blurring lines between security and tyranny.
What elevates the writing beyond typical sci-fi is its focus on moral complexity. There are no easy answers, characters make terrible choices under pressure, and the show grapples with questions about what makes us human.
Game of Thrones (2011-2019)
Based on George R.R. Martin’s novels, Game of Thrones (particularly in its early seasons) demonstrated that fantasy television could feature the same narrative complexity and character depth as prestige dramas. The writing subverted fantasy tropes—heroes die, villains win, and honor often leads to ruin.
The show’s writing strength lies in its political intrigue, morally gray characters, and willingness to shock audiences by killing major characters. While later seasons proved controversial, the show’s impact on expanding what fantasy television could achieve remains significant.
Why Great Writing Matters: Lessons for Viewers and Creators
Studying exceptionally written television offers valuable insights beyond mere entertainment. For aspiring writers, these shows provide masterclasses in:
- Character development: How to create three-dimensional people with believable motivations
- Dialogue craft: Making every line serve multiple purposes
- Structure innovation: Breaking rules effectively rather than randomly
- Thematic depth: Exploring ideas without being preachy
- Audience trust: Respecting viewer intelligence
For viewers, recognizing great writing enhances appreciation and helps distinguish quality content in an oversaturated market. Understanding what makes writing exceptional allows us to seek out shows that challenge, entertain, and ultimately enrich our lives.
Comparing Writing Styles: A Quick Reference
| Show | Genre | Writing Hallmark | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Sopranos | Crime Drama | Psychological depth, dream symbolism | Character study enthusiasts |
| Breaking Bad | Crime Drama | Meticulous plotting, character transformation | Fans of moral complexity |
| The Wire | Crime Drama | Novelistic scope, institutional critique | Patient, detail-oriented viewers |
| Mad Men | Period Drama | Subtext, visual storytelling, formalism | Those who enjoy analyzing symbolism |
| Seinfeld | Sitcom | Observational humor, intricate plotting | Comedy fans who appreciate structure |
| Fleabag | Comedy-Drama | Fourth-wall breaking, economy of storytelling | Viewers seeking emotional depth in comedy |
| The West Wing | Political Drama | Rapid-fire dialogue, idealism | Those who love sharp, witty conversations |
| Succession | Drama | Cutting dialogue, Shakespearean family dynamics | Fans of dark satire and power struggles |
| The Twilight Zone | Anthology/Sci-Fi | Allegory, twist endings, social commentary | Viewers who enjoy thought-provoking stories |
| Better Call Saul | Crime Drama | Character transformation, visual storytelling | Those who appreciate slow-burn narratives |
Hidden Gems: Exceptionally Written Shows You Might Have Missed
While prestige dramas dominate conversations about great TV writing, several lesser-known series deserve recognition:
Six Feet Under (2001-2005)
Alan Ball’s drama about a family funeral home explores mortality with dark humor and profound intimacy. The writing excels at making death—the ultimate universal experience—feel both deeply personal and darkly comic. Each episode begins with a death, but the show is really about how the living cope with loss, family, and finding meaning.
Deadwood (2004-2006)
David Milch’s Western features some of television’s most distinctive dialogue—Shakespearean in its poetry, profane in its vocabulary, and utterly unique in its rhythm. The show’s writing transforms historical events into complex character studies while creating a fully realized world with its own linguistic patterns.
Friday Night Lights (2006-2011)
This high school football drama could have been formulaic sports clichés. Instead, Peter Berg and his writers created something genuine—a portrait of small-town Texas life that explores class, race, family, and ambition with honesty and heart. The naturalistic dialogue and documentary-style filming create emotional authenticity rare in network television.
Better Call Saul (2015-2022)
Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould’s Breaking Bad prequel proved that spin-offs can match or exceed their source material. The show’s writing demonstrates extraordinary patience, developing Jimmy McGill’s transformation into Saul Goodman over six seasons while maintaining tension despite viewers knowing the ultimate outcome.
The Evolution of Television Writing: From Network Constraints to Creative Freedom
Understanding television’s best writing requires recognizing how the medium has evolved. Early television operated under significant creative constraints—censorship, limited episode budgets, network interference, and the need for broad audience appeal.
Classic shows like I Love Lucy, The Twilight Zone, and All in the Family achieved greatness despite (and sometimes because of) these limitations. Writers became masters of suggestion, innuendo, and clever construction to convey ideas that couldn’t be stated directly.
The cable revolution beginning in the late 1990s gave writers unprecedented creative freedom. HBO’s slogan “It’s Not TV, It’s HBO” signaled a shift—shows could feature profanity, nudity, and mature themes previously impossible on broadcast networks. More importantly, they could take narrative risks, end ambiguously, and challenge audiences.
This evolution didn’t make all modern television superior to classic shows. Rather, it created different types of excellence. The best contemporary shows use their freedom thoughtfully, while classic series remain impressive for accomplishing so much within restrictions.
What Modern Streaming Means for TV Writing

The streaming era has again transformed television writing. Freed from commercial breaks, episodes can run any length necessary. Seasons might be six episodes or twenty. Shows can take years between seasons. Entire series can drop at once, changing how writers structure stories.
This flexibility has benefits and drawbacks:
Advantages:
- Creative control with minimal network interference
- Freedom to tell complete stories across seasons
- No need to hit specific episode lengths
- Global audiences allowing niche content to find viewers
Challenges:
- Less discipline in editing and pacing
- Pressure to create “bingeable” content can sacrifice depth
- Shorter seasons mean less room for character development
- Shows cancelled abruptly without proper conclusions
The best streaming-era shows balance these factors. Fleabag‘s two short seasons tell a complete story without overstaying their welcome. Succession used its freedom to create cinematic episodes without rushing its narrative. Better Call Saul took six seasons to tell a story that could have been rushed in three.
Related: How Streaming Platforms Changed Content Consumption
How to Recognize Great TV Writing: A Viewer’s Guide
Not everyone analyzes television professionally, but any viewer can develop an eye for quality writing. Here are key indicators:
Dialogue That Sounds Human
Great dialogue captures how people actually talk—with interruptions, incomplete thoughts, and subtext. Characters should have distinct voices; you should be able to identify who’s speaking based on word choice and rhythm, not just content.
Actions Have Consequences
In well-written shows, character choices matter. Decisions made in early episodes ripple through later seasons. There’s narrative logic—events don’t happen randomly or disappear without impact.
Characters Contain Contradictions
Real people are inconsistent—capable of kindness and cruelty, brilliance and stupidity. Great writing embraces this complexity rather than creating one-dimensional heroes or villains.
Trust in Audience Intelligence
Exceptional shows don’t over-explain. They allow viewers to make connections, understand subtext, and tolerate ambiguity. If a show constantly spells out what’s happening or what characters feel, the writing likely lacks sophistication.
Rewatchability
The best-written shows reveal new layers on subsequent viewings. You notice foreshadowing, catch jokes you missed, and appreciate structural choices that weren’t apparent initially.
The Writer’s Room: Collaboration Behind Great Television
Unlike film, where a single screenwriter (or small team) crafts the script, television operates through writers’ rooms—collaborative environments where staff writers contribute to each episode under the showrunner’s vision.
This collaborative model explains why television can sustain quality across multiple seasons. Shows like The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, and Mad Men featured talented writing staffs who understood the showrunner’s vision while contributing their own perspectives.
The writers’ room also allows for career development. Many acclaimed showrunners started as staff writers on other great shows. Vince Gilligan wrote for The X-Files. Matthew Weiner wrote for The Sopranos. These apprenticeships in great writers’ rooms created the next generation of television auteurs.
Conclusion: The Lasting Power of Great Television Writing
Television’s best writing transcends its medium. These shows become cultural touchstones, shape our language, and influence how we understand storytelling. Walter White and Tony Soprano join Hamlet and King Lear in our collective imagination as archetypes of flawed humanity. The dialogue from The West Wing and Seinfeld enters our everyday conversations.
What makes these shows “must-watch” isn’t just their quality—it’s their ability to expand what we think television can achieve. Each one pushed boundaries, took creative risks, and proved that the medium could deliver experiences as profound as any novel or film.
For viewers seeking substance in an era of endless content, these shows represent a guaranteed investment. They reward attention, provoke thought, and demonstrate that television, when written with skill and ambition, ranks among humanity’s finest storytelling achievements.
Whether you’re discovering these classics for the first time or revisiting old favorites, the best-written television offers something increasingly rare in our fragmented media landscape: shared cultural experiences that challenge, entertain, and endure.
The shows on this list didn’t just entertain their audiences—they changed what audiences expected from television. That’s the ultimate measure of great writing: not just quality in the moment, but lasting impact that reshapes the medium itself.

